I have seen some people stating on Twitter that the Christchurch attack in New Zealand over the past weekend is a false flag. However, the only thing I can think of in common with past attacks is the confusion over whether or not there were multiple attackers. When I did a poll on my Twitter feed, the vast majority feel that it’s just conspiracy theory nonsense to think of the Christchurch massacre as a false flag, but I thought I would write a brief article going over some of the characteristics of false flags attack and see how many of these traits the Christchurch massacre exhibits. Other than the above-mentioned confusion over multiple shooters or just one shooter, here are some other characteristics of false flag attacks: The videos after the fact have been taken down. This could mean that the powers-that-be have something to hide, or it could mean that they merely do not want anyone to be incited by viewing the tragic video. An accompanying question I have, by the way, is why Facebook is permitted to show these videos? I heard, although I’m not sure, that the original video while it was happening in real time was disseminated on Facebook. There are also questions about the blood stains, another common theme in false flags.
Ultimately, I think such theories are simply amateurs trying to gain excitement of feeling like they are in the know. It helps them feel superior to others. But it’s another tragedy because the victims of the murdered families have to grieve twice, once for their fallen loved ones, and again for the implication that they don’t have a right to grieve because the tragic event supposedly did not occur.